We have never said there would absolutely never be ads on Wikipedia." In January of that year he told a reporter from ClickZ that "the question is going to arise as to whether we could better pursue our charitable mission with the additional money. As late as 2006 Wales refused to deny that there would ever be advertising on Wikipedia. "The suggestion that I demanded ads and that Jimmy Wales was opposed to them is, I am afraid, yet another self-serving lie from Wales", wrote Sanger. In an interview with Wired in January 2011, Wales categorically denied having supported the plans for advertising, prompting a public dispute with Sanger. Since this incident, the question of advertising has been a sensitive subject on Wikipedia. As a result, the Spanish Wikipedia was virtually inactive until mid-2003. Most of the Spanish volunteers followed Enyedy, producing over 10,000 articles within a year. The fork, set up by volunteer Edgar Enyedy, was hosted at the University of Seville under the name Enciclopedia Libre Universal en Español. February 2002 – In late February 2002, the Spanish Wikipedia community decided to break away (" fork") from Wikipedia to protest plans by co-founders Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger to sell advertising on Wikipedia sites.To address criticism about restricting access while minimizing malicious editing of those pages, Wikipedia has also tried measures such as "pending changes" that would open contentious articles for more people to edit, then subject their contributions to approval from more established members of the site. become fully-fledged when they are advertised outside the page being debated" and one college discusses Wikipedia as a curricular tool, in that "recent controversies involving Wikipedia as a basis for discussion of ethics and bias." Editing restrictionsĭespite being promoted as an encyclopedia "anyone can edit", the ability to edit controversial pages is sometimes restricted because of "edit wars" or vandalism. Sociologist Howard Rheingold says that "Wikipedia controversies have revealed the evolution of social mechanisms in the Wikipedia community" a study of the politicization of socio-technical spaces remarked that Wikipedia "controversies. The nature of Wikipedia controversies has been analyzed by scholars. This list is a collection of the more notable instances. Controversies within and concerning Wikipedia and the WMF have been the subject of several scholarly papers. In 2015, the Orangemoody investigation showed that businesses and minor celebrities had been blackmailed over their Wikipedia articles by a coordinated group of fraudsters, again using hundreds of sockpuppets. Another controversy arose in 2013 after an investigation by Wikipedians found that the Wiki-PR company had edited Wikipedia for paying clients, using "an army" of sockpuppet accounts that purportedly included 45 Wikipedia editors and administrators. The presence of inaccurate and false information, as well as the perceived hostile editing climate, have been linked to a decline in editor participation. The 2012 scandals involving paid consultancy for the government of Gibraltar by Roger Bamkin, a Wikimedia UK board member, and potential conflicts of interest have highlighted Wikipedia's vulnerabilities. in theology and a degree in canon law" when in fact he was a 24-year-old who held no advanced degrees. In March 2007, Wikipedia was again the subject of media attention with the Essjay controversy, which involved a prominent English Wikipedia editor and administrator who claimed he was a "tenured professor of religion at a private university" with a "Ph.D. This incident began in May 2005 with the anonymous posting of a hoax Wikipedia article with false, negative allegations about John Seigenthaler, a well-known American journalist. The Seigenthaler biography incident led to media criticism of the reliability of Wikipedia. Common subjects of coverage include articles containing false information, public figures, corporations editing articles for which they have a conflict of interest, paid Wikipedia editing and hostile interactions between Wikipedia editors and public figures. The media have covered controversial events and scandals related to Wikipedia and its funding organization, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF). Wikipedia's open-editing model, under which anyone can edit most articles, has led to concerns, such as the quality of writing, the amount of vandalism, and the accuracy of information on the project. Since the launch of Wikipedia in 2001, several controversies have occurred. The hoax raised questions about the reliability of Wikipedia and other websites with user-generated content. John Seigenthaler, an American journalist, was the subject of a defamatory Wikipedia hoax article in May 2005.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |